The argument is one which some Apple critics have made for years, as spelled out in an essay in January by Cory Doctorow, the science fiction author, tech critic, and co-author of Chokepoint Capitalism. “The moment an Android person is added to a chat or group chat, the complete dialog flips to SMS, an insecure, trivially hacked privateness nightmare that debuted 38 years in the past—the 12 months Wayne’s World had its first cinematic run,” Doctorow writes. “Apple’s reply to that is grimly hilarious. The corporate’s place is that if you wish to have actual safety in your communications, you should purchase your mates iPhones.”
In a press release to WIRED, Apple says it designs its merchandise to “work seamlessly collectively, shield individuals’s privateness and safety, and create a magical expertise for our customers,” and provides that the DOJ lawsuit “threatens who we’re and the rules that set Apple merchandise aside” in the market. The corporate additionally says it hasn’t launched an Android model of iMessage as a result of it could not be certain that third events would implement it in ways in which met the firm’s requirements.
“If profitable, [the lawsuit] would hinder our skill to create the sort of know-how individuals count on from Apple—the place {hardware}, software program, and providers intersect,” the assertion continues. “It will additionally set a harmful precedent, empowering authorities to take a heavy hand in designing individuals’s know-how. We imagine this lawsuit is unsuitable on the details and the legislation, and we are going to vigorously defend towards it.”
Apple has, in reality, not solely declined to construct iMessage purchasers for Android or different non-Apple gadgets, however actively fought towards those that have. Final 12 months, a service known as Beeper launched with the promise of bringing iMessage to Android customers. Apple responded by tweaking its iMessage service to interrupt Beeper’s performance, and the startup known as it quits in December.
Apple argued in that case that Beeper had harmed customers’ safety—in reality, it did compromise iMessage’s end-to-end encryption by decrypting after which re-encrypting messages on a Beeper server, although Beeper had vowed to alter that in future updates. Beeper cofounder Eric Migicovsky argued that Apple’s heavyhanded transfer to cut back Apple-to-Android texts to conventional textual content messaging was hardly a safer various.
“It’s sort of loopy that we’re now in 2024 and there nonetheless is not a simple, encrypted, high-quality approach for one thing so simple as a textual content between an iPhone and an Android,” Migicovsky instructed WIRED in January. “I believe Apple reacted in a extremely awkward, bizarre approach—arguing that Beeper Mini threatened the safety and privateness of iMessage customers, when in actuality, the reality is the precise reverse.”
Whilst Apple has confronted accusations of hoarding iMessage’s safety properties to the detriment of smartphone homeowners worldwide, it is solely continued to enhance these options: In February it upgraded iMessage to make use of new cryptographic algorithms designed to be resistant to quantum codebreaking, and final October it added Contact Key Verification, a function designed to forestall man-in-the-middle assaults that spoof meant contacts to intercept messages. Maybe extra importantly, it is mentioned it would undertake the RCS normal to permit for enhancements in messaging with Android customers—though the firm didn’t say whether or not these enhancements would come with end-to-end encryption.